Retrieval ✦ 88outlineNot a production recipe

引用 / 主张支持核对

主张 + 证据 → Choice;insufficient 则不断言。

Who: RAG / research product teams. Steps: (1) Gather claim + evidence snippets (search optional). (2) Choice: supported / contradicted / mixed / insufficient. (3) Insufficient → do not assert. Expected effect: fewer hallucinated citations in generated answers.

1

复制提示词(保留英文原文效果最好)。

2

在代码里实现——调用 System One / Jev,由你的程序组合答案。

3

回答它的设置问题——大多数提示词会先采访你,然后进入固定节奏。

提示词

提示词
Audience: RAG / research products.
Steps:
1) Claim + evidence snippets as state (search optional).
2) Choice: supported | contradicted | mixed | insufficient_evidence.
3) If insufficient → refuse to assert; else continue generation with caveats.
Expected effect: fewer unsupported citations.

需要授权:typesafe-sdksearch-api

它是怎么搭起来的

以下说明为英文原文(来自社区作者),提示词本身建议保留英文。

Sources: citation_check cookbook · SerpApi · Getting started with Jev fact checker.

When confidence is low, route to human review instead of auto-publishing citations.

Sources (wave-2 deepen)

为什么它好用

Forces an abstain path when evidence does not back the claim.

本案例收集自公开的 Jev 社区,版权归原作者所有。提示词属于参考资料:运行前请先审阅内容, 并且不要让 bot 超出你实际授予的权限行事。